Fat Grafting · Morristown, NJ

Facial FatGrafting

Procedure Time 1–2 Hours
Recovery 7–14 Days
Anesthesia Local/IV
Results Long-lasting

Volume loss is at the heart of facial aging

The face does not age primarily by sagging — it ages by deflating. Over the course of decades, the fat compartments that give the young face its fullness, convexity, and luminosity gradually diminish. The midface hollows. The temples thin. The undereye area deepens. The cheeks lose the gentle projection that the young face takes for granted. Skin folds and wrinkles are, in large part, a downstream consequence of this underlying volume loss — and no amount of skin tightening can fully address them without first restoring the structural support beneath.

Facial fat grafting — also called fat transfer or autologous fat transplantation — addresses this fundamental cause directly. Fat is harvested from a donor site on the body (typically the abdomen, flanks, or inner thighs), processed to isolate the most viable fat cells, and reinjected into the depleted facial compartments using fine cannulas. The result is a gradual, natural-looking restoration of volume that integrates seamlessly with surrounding tissue — because it is living tissue from the same person.

Unlike hyaluronic acid fillers, which metabolize over 12–24 months and require repeated treatment, a meaningful percentage of transplanted fat survives permanently. After an initial period of settling — during which some fat is resorbed — the surviving fat cells integrate into their new location and remain as long-lasting volume restoration.

Where fat is placed — and why

The face is divided into discrete fat compartments that deflate at different rates and to different degrees. Dr. Rafizadeh addresses each patient's specific pattern of depletion rather than applying a generic injection protocol. The most commonly treated areas include:

Midface / malar eminence — restoring projection over the cheekbone is often the highest-impact change. Even a modest increase in malar volume lifts the midface optically, reduces the depth of the nasolabial fold, and produces a younger, more rested appearance without any upward pulling or distortion.

Tear trough / infraorbital hollow — the shadowed groove between the lower eyelid and cheek is among the most aging features of the face. Small amounts of precisely placed fat in this compartment significantly improve the under-eye appearance, and the result tends to be more stable and natural-looking than filler in this location.

Temples — temporal hollowing is one of the most overlooked aging changes and one of the most effective to correct. Restoring temporal volume produces an immediate impression of youthfulness by re-establishing the smooth, convex skull silhouette of the younger face.

Nasolabial folds / marionette lines — these folds are partly structural (ligamentous), partly sagging, and partly volumetric. Fat grafting addresses the volumetric component by restoring the underlying support, which reduces fold depth without the firm, unnatural feel that filler in this location can create.

Lips — small amounts of fat can be placed in the lips to add natural fullness and address the fine vertical lip lines that develop with age. This is addressed in more detail on the fat transfer to lips page.

Schedule a ConsultationMeet with Dr. Rafizadeh personally to discuss your goals and a personalized plan. Call (973) 267-0928 or request a consultation online.

Harvest, processing, and placement

Facial fat grafting is a three-phase procedure: harvest, processing, and injection.

Harvest — fat is extracted from a donor site using a small-bore cannula and low-pressure syringe technique. The gentlest possible extraction is used, as high-vacuum or power-assisted harvesting damages fat cell membranes and reduces graft survival. Common donor sites are the lower abdomen, flanks, and inner thighs. Harvest typically leaves minimal bruising and resolves within 7–10 days.

Processing — harvested fat is processed to remove oil (from ruptured cells), blood, and tumescent fluid — all of which reduce graft viability and increase inflammation. Dr. Rafizadeh uses centrifugation at low speed followed by decanting, which concentrates viable adipocytes while removing non-viable fractions.

Injection — processed fat is loaded into fine syringes and injected in small aliquots (0.1–0.3 cc per pass) through micro-cannulas placed through 1 mm access punctures. Injection in micro-aliquots is critical: fat injected in large boluses does not survive because cells in the center of the bolus are too far from the vascular supply to receive oxygen. The threading technique — depositing fat along multiple tunnels in multiple tissue planes — maximizes surface contact between transplanted fat and host tissue.

"The key to fat grafting survival is micro-aliquot deposition. Every droplet of fat must have direct contact with vascularized tissue — and that means placing many small threads, not a few large deposits."

Dr. Farhad Rafizadeh MD FACS

Fat survival: what to expect

Fat graft survival is the central variable in facial fat grafting and the most common source of patient questions. Published survival rates range from 40% to 80% of transplanted volume at one year, depending on technique, donor site, recipient site vascularity, and patient factors such as smoking status and metabolic health.

Because some resorption is expected, surgeons typically over-correct slightly at the time of surgery — placing a small amount more than the target volume to account for anticipated resorption. In the first 4–8 weeks, the face will look slightly fuller than the final result; the actual result becomes apparent at 3–4 months and remains stable thereafter.

Recipient Site Approx. Survival Rate Notes
Malar / midface 60–75% Well-vascularized; reliable survival
Temples 55–70% Thin tissue layer; precise placement required
Tear trough 50–65% Delicate area; small volumes critical
Nasolabial / marionette 45–65% Variable due to muscle movement
Lips 40–60% High-movement area; technique-sensitive

Fat grafting combined with facelift

Fat grafting and facelift address aging from complementary directions: facelift addresses descent and excess skin; fat grafting addresses volume deflation. Combining them in a single procedure — the "volumetric facelift" approach — produces results that neither procedure alone achieves. Tightening without restoring volume can create a hollow, stretched appearance; restoring volume without addressing descent produces a fuller but still aged face. The combination produces a genuinely rejuvenated result that is natural and appropriate to the patient's age.

Fat grafting can also be combined with blepharoplasty to address the tear trough simultaneously with lower eyelid surgery, or with rhinoplasty to provide nasal tip refinement support or dorsal augmentation using fat rather than cartilage in selected cases.

Cost in New Jersey

Standalone facial fat grafting typically ranges from $4,500 to $8,000 depending on the number of facial zones addressed and the volume transferred. When combined with facelift or blepharoplasty, the incremental cost is lower. Financing is available through CareCredit and Alphaeon Credit.

Frequently asked questions

How long do fat grafting results last?+
The fat that survives the initial resorption phase — typically 40–80% of the transplanted volume at one year — behaves like normal fat cells: it is permanent. It will fluctuate with significant weight changes (gaining or losing weight affects transplanted fat just as it affects native fat), but it does not dissolve or metabolize like hyaluronic acid filler. Many patients enjoy their fat grafting results for 5–10 years or longer.
What are the donor site options?+
Common donor sites include the lower abdomen, flanks, inner thighs, and inner knees. Dr. Rafizadeh selects the donor site based on available volume and the patient's preference. Donor site harvesting for facial fat grafting requires relatively small volumes (typically 50–150 cc of harvested fat to yield 20–60 cc of processed, injectable fat), so it produces minimal change at the donor site and heals quickly.
Can fat grafting replace facelift?+
For some patients in their 40s with early-stage volume loss and minimal skin laxity, fat grafting alone can produce significant rejuvenation. For patients with more advanced skin laxity, jowling, or neck descent, fat grafting complements but cannot replace facelift — adding volume to a face with significant descent will simply produce a fuller, descended face. The right procedure depends on the patient's specific anatomy, and Dr. Rafizadeh will provide an honest assessment at consultation.
What if I want more volume after seeing my results?+
Touch-up fat grafting can be performed once the initial result has stabilized, typically at 3–6 months post-operatively. Some patients choose to have a second session to add additional volume in specific zones. Others are satisfied with the initial result. Because fat can be stored (frozen) from the initial harvest in some protocols, a touch-up can sometimes be performed from stored fat without a new harvest — Dr. Rafizadeh will discuss this option at your consultation.
Is facial fat grafting safe near the eyes?+
Periorbital fat grafting — particularly in the tear trough — requires precise technique and very small volumes. In skilled hands, it is safe and produces excellent, long-lasting improvement in the under-eye area. The primary risk in periorbital fat grafting is vascular occlusion from inadvertent intravascular injection, which is prevented by using blunt-tipped cannulas (rather than sharp needles), injecting in retrograde motion, and using very small deposit volumes. Dr. Rafizadeh uses these safety protocols for all periorbital work.
Volume

Restore what time has taken.

A consultation includes a complete facial volume analysis and honest discussion of what fat grafting — alone or in combination — can achieve for your anatomy.

Request a Consultation (973) 267-0928

Clinical References

  1. Coleman SR. "Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler." Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(3 Suppl):108S–120S.
  2. Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA. "In search of improved fat transfer viability: a quantitative analysis of the role of centrifugation and harvest site." Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(1):391–5.
  3. Meier JD, Glasgold RA, Glasgold MJ. "Autologous fat grafting: long-term evidence of its efficacy in midfacial rejuvenation." Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(1):24–8.
  4. Lambros V. "Observations on periorbital and midface aging." Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(5):1367–76.
  5. Gutowski KA; ASPS Fat Graft Task Force. "Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: a report of the ASPS fat graft task force." Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(1):272–80.